Hala Bawadi, Zaid Al-Hamdan, Nagham Abu Shaqra, Maher Maaitah, Abdelmanie Suleimat, Asma Basha, Shawqi Saleh, Mohammad Al-Hamdan, Mazen El -Zibdah, Raja Khater, Awab Al-Hamdan, Ahmad Abdulla
ABSTRACT
The birthing process presents women with both physical and emotional challenges. Recently, there has been a global increase in the use of cesarean section (CS), especially elective CS, in Jordan. The evidence suggests that numerous factors encourage women to opt for a Cesarean section (CS) over a normal delivery. This study identifies the factors that influence Jordanian women's preferences regarding the mode of delivery. This cross-sectional study focused on Jordanian women in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. They were all either primiparous or para-one. The data were collected via a structured self-administered questionnaire comprising 52 questions. The study sample comprised 432 women, more than half of whom (57.2%) were aged 25--34 years. Approximately two-thirds (63.0%) were in their third trimester of pregnancy. The most reported source of information about maternal health and pregnancy was doctors (81.5%), followed by nurses (39.6%). The average knowledge score was 71.4%. The women preferred normal vaginal delivery over Cesarean section. They had incorrect beliefs (30%) about both modes of delivery, with an average of 70%. Additionally, they were not significantly involved in the decision-making process. Research has revealed that the level of Jordanian women’s knowledge regarding delivery methods varies significantly by geographic location and educational level. The results highlight the benefits of creating programs to teach women about the advantages and disadvantages of both CS and vaginal delivery. Both have particular benefits, risks, and consequences. Possessing appropriate knowledge would assist women in making informed decisions regarding which mode of delivery better suits their circumstances.
